Prostate Cancer
On this page
- Basal cell layer loss, which disrupts the basement membrane, defines prostate adenocarcinoma on biopsy, unlike crowding or prominent nucleoli; absent high-molecular-weight cytokeratin/p63 staining in an atypical focus confirms it and positive staining excludes it.
- Serum PSA rises in prostate cancer because basal cell loss disrupts the basement membrane and lumen architecture, even though each cancer cell makes less PSA than normal prostate tissue.
- Single-core high-grade PIN needs no immediate re-biopsy; resume PSA/DRE surveillance, reassessing at 12 months, as 1-year re-biopsy cancer yield (26.4%) is not significantly higher than after benign biopsy (10–25%).
- Unlike single-core disease, multifocal high-grade PIN (2 or more cores) warrants further evaluation: biomarkers, MRI if not already done, or repeat biopsy within 1 year.
- Atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP, about 5% of needle biopsies) needs repeat biopsy within 3–6 months regardless of PSA, since 30–50% show cancer on re-biopsy, far more than high-grade PIN.
- Before re-biopsying ASAP, consider expert pathology review, since atypia is the diagnosis most often changed on review; re-biopsy should sample the whole gland with extra cores at and around the ASAP site.
Pathology & Pre-Cancerous Lesions
PIN
- Low-grade or unifocal high-grade — no increased risk of developing prostate cancer; monitor PSA + DRE (biopsy only if suspicion)
- Unifocal HGPIN → reassess at 12 months; cancer yield on re-biopsy within 1 year is 26.4% — not significantly higher than after a benign biopsy (10–25%)
- A single core of PIN needs no re-biopsy — just monitor PSA and DRE
- Multifocal high-grade (2 or more cores) — cancer risk ≈ 30%; monitor PSA + DRE and repeat biopsy in 1–3 years
- Exam answer: multifocal HGPIN warrants further evaluation — biomarkers, MRI (if not already done) or repeat biopsy within 1 year
- It matters to distinguish PIN from ductal or intraductal carcinoma — a uropathologist's call
- In an elderly patient with HGPIN found on TURP, often no further workup is instituted; in a younger man a more aggressive workup to exclude clinically significant tumor may be warranted
AAH (Adenosis)
- Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia — no risk of cancer
ASAP
- HMWCK positive
- Suspicious but non-diagnostic
- Found in about 5% of needle biopsies
- Does not alter PSA
- → Re-biopsy in 3–6 months, focusing on the atypical regions
- Re-biopsy regardless of PSA
- Before re-biopsy, consider expert pathology review — atypia is the diagnosis most often changed on review
- Sample the whole gland, with extra cores at and around the ASAP site
- Cancer risk: 40–60%
- Exam answer: 30–50% show cancer on re-biopsy — far more than high-grade PIN
Prostate Cancer Histology
- HMWCK negative
- Types:
- Acinar (most common — > 95% of adenocarcinomas; 85% arise in the peripheral zone, multifocal in >85%)
- Ductal (normal PSA) CI to AS
- Intraductal — a rare and aggressive variant (Gleason 4+4); grows into the urethral lumen and usually presents with obstructive voiding symptoms + hematuria; does not alter PSA. CI to AS
- Non-adenocarcinoma is < 5%, of which transitional cell is the most common
Why HMWCK staining answers the question
- Prostate adenocarcinoma arises from prostate epithelial cells, which stain positive for prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) and PSA
- Normal prostate has a basal cell layer, which stains positive for HMWCK and negative for PAP and PSA
- Prostate adenocarcinoma NEVER has a basal cell layer
- Basal cell loss disrupts the basement membrane — this defines adenocarcinoma on biopsy, not epithelial crowding or prominent nucleoli
- So: stain with HMWCK → positive = basal layer present = benign; negative = no basal layer = malignant, and it will stain positive for PAP and PSA
- p63 also marks basal cells — absent HMWCK/p63 staining in an atypical focus confirms carcinoma; positive staining excludes it
- Cancer mimics — partial atrophy, adenosis and HGPIN may also lack basal cells → small lesions may need HMWCK/p63 + AMACR staining to settle the diagnosis
Risk Factors
- African ancestry (incidence Black > White > Hispanic > Asian)
- Age >40
- Germline mutations: BRCA2 (most aggressive), BRCA1, CHEK2, Lynch (MLH1/MSH2/MSH6/PMS2)
- TMPRSS2:ERG fusion in ~50% sporadic PCa
- Mets pattern: LN → bone (osteoblastic) → lung → bladder → liver
Family history — relative risk
| Family history | Relative risk | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| None | 1 | — |
| Father affected | 2.17 | 1.90–2.49 |
| Brother affected | 3.37 | 2.97–3.83 |
| First-degree relative affected, age < 65 at diagnosis | 3.34 | 2.64–4.23 |
| > 2 first-degree relatives affected | 5.08 | 3.31–7.79 |
| Second-degree relative affected | 1.68 | 1.07–2.64 |
- A brother affected carries higher risk than a father affected
- One affected first-degree relative → risk 2–3 fold; risk rises with the number of affected relatives, their degree of relatedness and their age at diagnosis
Chromosomal and germline detail
- Chromosome 8 — typically loss of the p arm and gain of the q arm; the most common chromosomal abnormality in advanced prostate cancer
- The best-established prostate cancer locus: 8q24 is a germline GWAS susceptibility locus (with 17q21)
- 8q is home to MYC and frequently undergoes somatic whole-arm gain
- High-risk 8q24 alleles are more common in Black men — paralleling their highest incidence (172.6 per 100,000 in the US) and roughly double the cancer-specific mortality of White men
- > 100 germline GWAS SNPs influence prostate cancer risk — multi-SNP panels can identify very low- and very high-risk men, but none correlate with aggressiveness
- Chromosomes 10 and 7 are also altered; others — 13q, 16q, 17p, 18q
- PTEN is more frequently altered in advanced disease
- BRCA2 is the most common germline mutation in metastatic prostate cancer, and is associated with lethal disease
- BRCA2 and Lynch syndrome each raise the risk of developing prostate cancer 2–6 fold
- BRCA1, BRCA2 and ATM are inherited DNA damage-repair genes that increase the risk of aggressive disease
Germline vs Somatic Testing
| Germline | Somatic | |
|---|---|---|
| Origin | Inherited from parents at conception | Acquired after conception |
| Heritable? | Can be passed to the next generation | Cannot be transmitted |
| Who can be tested | Persons with and without cancer | Only patients |
| Sample | Blood (lymphocytes), buccal swab, or saliva | Cancer tissue is a must |
| Predicts | Risk of developing future cancer | — |
- Most mutations in prostate cancer are somatic
Indications for germline testing
- High-risk prostate cancer
- N1 or M1 disease
- Significant family history — first-degree, younger age at diagnosis (< 65), number of members affected
- Exam answer: a strong family history is a brother or father diagnosed < 60, dying of prostate cancer or with metastatic disease
- → screen from age 40 and test for BRCA1/2, Lynch syndrome, ATM and CHEK2
- Exam answer: a strong family history is a brother or father diagnosed < 60, dying of prostate cancer or with metastatic disease
- Ductal, intraductal or cribriform patterns
PSA Biology & Interpretation
- Half-life: 2–3 days; a glycoprotein, molecular weight 33 kD, 7% carbohydrate
- Organ-preferential, not organ-exclusive — elevated PSA is most characteristic of prostate and breast malignancies
- 30–70% of breast carcinomas express PSA, driven by steroid receptors
- In breast cancer, PSA positivity correlates with ER/PR-positive disease and a more favorable prognosis — the opposite of its meaning in prostate cancer
- Why serum PSA rises in cancer: basal cell loss disrupts the basement membrane and lumen architecture — even though each cancer cell makes less PSA than normal prostate tissue
- Bound to: α1-antichymotrypsin, α1-protease inhibitor
- 70–80% bound — mainly to α1-antichymotrypsin (ACT), lesser to α1-protease inhibitor and α2-macroglobulin; the remaining 20–30% circulates free
- The PSA–ACT complex is the major form of PSA in serum — found at higher concentrations in cancer than in benign disease
- ↑ by: BPH, prostatitis, UTI, biopsy (↑6–8 ng/mL, normalizes 2–3 wk), TURP, cycling
- Minimal effect: DRE, catheterization, TRUS without biopsy
- 5-ARIs halve PSA at 12 mo → double observed value
- PSA reaches its nadir by 6–12 months
- 25–40% of newly elevated PSAs normalize → repeat before biopsy
Other Markers
Before diagnosis — after a previously negative biopsy
| Type | Test | What it does |
|---|---|---|
| Serum | 4kScore, Prostate Health Index (PHI) | Risk-stratify the likelihood of high-grade cancer on repeat biopsy |
| Urine | PCA3, ExoDx, SelectMDx | SelectMDx evaluates mRNA in urine after DRE — useless if the patient has a urinary diversion |
| Tissue | ConfirmMDx | Epigenetic evaluation of hypermethylation in three genes, on tissue from the previous negative biopsy (within the prior 30 months) |
| Tissue | Mitochondrial DNA testing | Like ConfirmMDx, uses negative-biopsy tissue to predict cancer on repeat biopsy |
- PCA3 — best predicts the need for repeat biopsy after a negative biopsy with a rising PSA: FDA-approved in this setting and independent of prostate size
- A prostate-specific long non-coding RNA, measured in the first 20–30 mL of urine after an attentive DRE
- Score = PCA3 mRNA ÷ PSA mRNA × 1000
- Urinary diversion + prior negative biopsy → ConfirmMDx on the prior biopsy tissue — the urine contains no prostate mRNA, so urine-based tests are inappropriate
After diagnosis — biopsy-based genomic tests
| Test | What it measures |
|---|---|
| Decipher | mRNA expression of 22 genes |
| Prolaris | mRNA expression of cell cycle progression genes; predicts CSM and recurrence |
| Oncotype DX | Predicts adverse pathology — T3 or Gleason 4 |
- These three predict adverse pathology, metastasis or cancer-specific mortality — and are NOT indicated prior to a diagnosis of prostate cancer
- Oncotype DX (mRNA of 17 genes) → the test in low-risk disease that predicts adverse pathology: Gleason 4+3=7 or extracapsular extension at prostatectomy
- Decipher and Prolaris → predict metastasis or cancer-specific mortality
Screening
- PSA elevation occurs 6–13 years before prostate cancer causes symptoms
- An abnormal PSA should be repeated in the same lab after 4–6 weeks
- PSA 3–10 ng/mL with a nonsuspicious DRE → repeat PSA after 4 weeks before deciding on biopsy — because of analytical and biological variability
- Use the same assay too; avoid recent ejaculation, manipulation and urinary infection
- If it normalizes → next PSA in 1 year
- Start screening at 50; if high risk, start at 40 — family history, African ancestry, germline mutations
- Men aged 40–49 have a median PSA of 0.7 ng/mL — a man in this age group above the median is at higher risk of developing prostate cancer with an aggressive subtype
- Annual screening is advised for: African ancestry, family history, or a PSA above the median for the age group
Age 70–75 — the decision point
| PSA at 70–75 | Risk of dying from prostate cancer | Implication |
|---|---|---|
| < 3 | Very low — ≤ 3% | Further screening unlikely to benefit |
| > 3 | 7% | More likely to benefit from further PSA testing |
Screening intervals
| Body | Interval |
|---|---|
| American Cancer Society | PSA < 2.5 → every 24 months; PSA > 2.5 → annual ± DRE |
| AUA | Every 2 years, with or without DRE |
DRE
- Prostate cancer is found in 30% of suspicious DREs
- With PSA ≤ 4 ng/mL, a suspicious DRE has a PPV of 5–30%
- An abnormal DRE also predicts a higher ISUP grade group and advanced disease
- DRE raises PSA by only 0.26 ng/mL — not a reason to defer testing
PSA density
- PSAD = PSA ÷ prostate volume; suspect cancer if PSAD > 0.15
Free PSA — the higher the free PSA%, the lower the risk
| Free PSA | Probability of prostate cancer |
|---|---|
| < 10% | 56% |
| > 25% | 8% |
- Do not use free PSA in ESRD patients on hemodialysis
- Severe CKD raises absolute free PSA and percent free PSA (free/total); total PSA and other isoforms such as proPSA are not associated with renal dysfunction
- Free PSA is a component of PHI and the 4Kscore → in severe CKD these give an artificially lower estimated cancer risk
- Cystoscopy raises free PSA
MRI & PI-RADS
| PI-RADS | Cancer Risk | csPCa (GG≥2) |
|---|---|---|
| 1–2 | ~25% | ~7% |
| 3 | ~33% | 12–15% |
| 4 | ~62% | 39–48% |
| 5 | ~66% (GS ≥3+4; 37% GS 4+3) | ~72% |
- PI-RADS 5 with negative biopsy → repeat MRI then biopsy
- Hypoechoic lesion on TRUS → ~57% cancer
- Hypoechoic lesions should be biopsied, but are not pathognomonic for cancer and do not correlate with Gleason score (aggressiveness)
- 39% of cancers are isoechoic and 1% hyperechoic; an irradiated prostate is diffusely hypoechoic
- Corpora amylacea — echogenic calcifications along the surgical capsule, highlighting the plane between the transition and peripheral zones; a normal landmark, not a pathologic finding
- Small, multiple diffuse calcifications on TRUS → a normal incidental result of age; larger symptomatic calculi may reflect infection or inflammation → need further evaluation
- Post-biopsy: wait 6–8 weeks before MRI
Factors Suggesting Need for Biopsy
- Abnormal DRE
- A nodule is an independent indication regardless of PSA — even at PSA 1.0 ng/mL; ~18% of cancers are detected by suspect DRE alone
- Abnormal PSA, PSAV, or PSAD (single abnormal PSA alone should not trigger biopsy → repeat first)
- Abnormal MRI (PI-RADS ≥3)
- PSA fails to decline on 5-ARI
- A rise from nadir while still on the 5-ARI is suspicious for malignancy regardless of the absolute value → biopsy
- After TRUS biopsy: ~75% negative | False-negative rate 20–30%
- Most common complications post-biopsy: hematospermia and hematuria
- Bleeding is the commonest complication even with normal coagulation: hematuria 23–63%, hematospermia 9.8–50.4% → both usually self-limited
- Hematospermia can persist up to 4–6 weeks → no clinical consequence, but counsel patients about its likelihood
- Serious complications needing hospitalization < 2% · clot retention ~0.7% · intervention for hematuria < 1%
PSA velocity thresholds
- > 0.35 ng/mL/yr when PSA < 4
- > 0.75 ng/mL/yr when PSA 4–10
Technique
- Minimum 12 cores [AUA]
- Ciprofloxacin is the pre-procedure antibiotic of choice
- A second biopsy must target the midline peripheral zone, the anterior apical peripheral zone, and the anterior transition zone —
- These are where cancer hides when the first biopsy was falsely negative
Contraindications
- Absolute: significant coagulopathy, severe immunosuppression, acute UTI / prostatitis
- Relative: painful anorectal conditions or anal stenosis → avoid office TRUS biopsy under local anesthesia; biopsy under general or regional anesthesia, or use a transperineal route
Seminal Vesicle Biopsy — Indications
- Suspected SV invasion
- Planning salvage cryotherapy after radiation
- PSA > 15, or a large tumor at the base of the prostate
Prognostic Factors on TRUS Biopsy
- Gleason score / Grade Group — the most important prognostic factor
- Presence of Gleason pattern 5 most strongly determines metastatic risk → SV invasion, extraprostatic extension and nodal disease are downstream markers of spread
- Number & % of positive cores
- SV involvement
- Periprostatic invasion
- Perineural invasion
- Cribriform / intraductal patterns
TNM Staging (AJCC 8th)
T
| Stage | Definition |
|---|---|
| T1a | Incidental histologic finding in ≤ 5% of tissue resected |
| T1b | Incidental histologic finding in > 5% of tissue resected |
| T1c | Identified by needle biopsy, not palpable |
| T2a | One-half of one side or less |
| T2b | More than one-half of one side, but not both sides |
| T2c | Both sides |
| T3a | Extracapsular extension (unilateral or bilateral) |
| T3b | Seminal vesicle invasion |
| T4 | Fixed, or invades adjacent structures — external sphincter, rectum, bladder, levator muscles, pelvic wall |
- Tissue resected in T1a/T1b = e.g., TURP chips
N
- N1: regional LN
- The side on which the lymph nodes are involved does not affect the N stage
M
- M1a: non-regional LN | M1b: bone | M1c: other (liver, lung, brain)
- When more than one site of metastasis is present, the most advanced category is used
Pathologic Stage
| Stage | Definition |
|---|---|
| pT2 | Organ confined |
| pT3a | Extraprostatic extension (unilateral or bilateral) or microscopic invasion of the bladder neck |
| pT3b | Seminal vesicle invasion |
| pT4 | Fixed, or invades adjacent structures |
- There is no pathologic T1 classification
- A positive surgical margin is indicated by an R1 descriptor — residual microscopic disease
Assigning the Gleason Grade
On prostatectomy
- Primary grade = the most predominant pattern
- Secondary grade = the second most predominant pattern
- If there are 3 different grades, a tertiary pattern is reported if it is higher than the secondary grade
- A small tertiary (third, usually more aggressive) pattern is recorded as a note alongside the grade group → associated with increased biochemical recurrence risk
On biopsy
- Primary grade = the most predominant pattern
- Secondary grade = the highest non-predominant pattern — the most dangerous one, not the second most common
- Counted however small the focus, because biopsy underestimates high-grade tumor → predominant 4 + focal 5 = 4+5 = 9 (GG5)
Worked examples
| Patterns present | Prostatectomy | Biopsy |
|---|---|---|
| Gleason 3 (60%) + Gleason 4 (40%) | 3+4 = 7 | 3+4 = 7 |
| Gleason 3 (100%) — pure | 3+3 = 6 (the only pattern is doubled) | 3+3 = 6 |
| Gleason 3 (60%) + 4 (30%) + 5 (10%) | 3+4 = 7, tertiary pattern 5 | 3+5 = 8 |
- Gleason score is difficult to characterize accurately in a patient who has received ADT
- Gleason scores 2–5 are no longer assigned — the lowest is 3+3 = 6 (GG1) → a biopsy reported as 5 (e.g., 3+2) needs slide review before staging or treatment
- Same after TURP: a Gleason sum of 3 cannot be placed on the current risk scale → re-evaluate and re-biopsy, with MRI first, before choosing management
Gleason → ISUP Grade Group
| GG | Gleason | Morphology |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ≤6 | Only individual discrete well-formed glands |
| 2 | 3+4=7 | Predominantly well-formed glands with a lesser component of poorly-formed/fused/cribriform |
| 3 | 4+3=7 | Predominantly poorly-formed/fused/cribriform with a lesser component of well-formed |
| 4 | 8 | Only poorly-formed/fused/cribriform glands — or predominantly well-formed with a lesser component lacking glands — or predominantly lacking glands with a lesser component of well-formed |
| 5 | 9–10 | Lacks gland formation (or with necrosis), with or without poorly-formed/fused/cribriform |
Risk Stratification
| Risk level | Criteria |
|---|---|
| Very Low | PSA < 10 & PSAD < 0.15 & clinical stage T1c & GG1 & ≤ 50% cancer per core & ≤ 3 positive cores |
| Low | PSA < 10 & GG1 & clinical stage T1–T2a & does not meet very-low criteria |
| Intermediate | No high-risk features and one or more of: PSA 10–20, GG 2–3, clinical stage T2b–T2c |
| Favorable intermediate | GG1 & PSA < 10 & T2b–T2c · or GG1 & PSA 10–20 & T1–T2a · or GG2 & PSA < 10 & T1–T2a |
| Unfavorable intermediate | GG1 & PSA 10–20 & T2b–T2c · or GG2 & PSA 10–20 & T1–T2a · or GG2 & PSA ≤ 20 & T2b–T2c · or GG3 & PSA ≤ 20 & ≤ T2c |
| High | PSA > 20 or GG ≥ 4 or clinical stage ≥ T3 |
- GG1 means Gleason ≤ 6 with no pattern 4 or 5
- When a lesion is biopsied with MRI-, TRUS- or DRE-guided targeting, all positive cores from that lesion count as a single positive core. For systematic biopsies this assumes ≥ 10 cores were taken
- NCCN additionally requires cancer in < 50% of biopsy cores as a mandatory criterion for favorable intermediate disease
- EAU (exam answer): Gleason 3+4 (GG2) + PSA < 10 + cT1–2 = favorable intermediate (cT2c alone is EAU high risk — see High Risk); GG2 + PSA 10–20 = unfavorable intermediate
- EAU risk groups derive from the D'Amico classification → they group patients with similar risk of biochemical recurrence after RP or EBRT
Very Low (Epstein)
- PSA <10, GG1, ≤3 cores, ≤50% involvement, PSAD <0.15, T1c
- PSAD < 0.15 ng/mL/cc is the NCCN cut separating very low from low → PSA 9 in a 45-mL gland = 0.2 → Gleason 3+3 disease is low risk
Low
- PSA <10 AND GG1 AND ≤T2a
- → AS first choice | alternatives: RP, EBRT, brachy
- AS stays preferred (normal DRE, PSA < 10, Gleason 3+3 = 6) even with an isolated family history but no known germline mutation
- → No imaging indicated
- → AS first choice | alternatives: RP, EBRT, brachy
Intermediate — Favorable
- GG1 + PSA <20 OR GG2 + PSA <10
- → LE >10 yr: AS, RP ± PLND (if nomogram >2%), OR EBRT ± brachy
- → LE <10 yr: Observation (preferred) OR EBRT ± brachy
- → Imaging: bone scan optional; cross-sectional imaging only if a nomogram indicates > 10% risk of regional node metastasis (see Imaging Indications)
Intermediate — Unfavorable
- GG2 + PSA 10–20 OR GG3 + PSA <20
- → LE >10 yr: RP + PLND (first choice) OR EBRT + short-term ADT
- → LE <10 yr: Observation OR EBRT + short-term ADT
- → Imaging: A/P + bone
High Risk
- PSA >20 OR GG4–5 OR ≥T3
- EAU (exam answer): high risk with any one of ISUP 4–5, PSA > 20 or cT2c → cT2c alone qualifies
- → LE >5 yr: RP + PLND OR EBRT + long-term ADT (preferred)
- → LE <5 yr: Observation OR ADT OR EBRT
- → Imaging: A/P + bone
Treatment Options in Order, by Risk
| Risk | Order |
|---|---|
| Low | 1. Active surveillance · 2. RP · 3. XRT · 4. Cryotherapy · 5. HIFU |
| Intermediate | 1. RP + PLND · 2. XRT · 3. AS (favorable only — see below) · 4. Cryotherapy · 5. HIFU |
| High (localized) | 1. RP + PLND · 2. XRT |
- AS for favorable intermediate is acceptable when the tumor is T2a or less, PSA < 10, < 10% Gleason pattern 4, and < 33% of cores positive
- AUA (exam answer): HIFU and other ablation should not be used in low-risk disease (AS preferred) or, outside a clinical trial, in high-risk disease
- In intermediate risk they are not preferred → high-quality comparative data are lacking
- ProtecT: RP and EBRT give equivalent oncological outcomes → 15-yr cancer-specific survival 97.8% vs 97.1%, metastatic progression 4.7% vs 5.0%
- Intermediate risk + closed-angle glaucoma → EBRT + short-term (4–6 months) ADT → robotic/laparoscopic RP needs prolonged steep-Trendelenburg pneumoperitoneum, which raises intraocular pressure
Cryotherapy
- For very low, low and intermediate risk, with no history of TURP, prostate size < 40 cc, and able to undergo transrectal ultrasound
- An alternative to RP in the obese patient, or after previous pelvic surgery or pelvic radiation
- Side effects — AUR, genital swelling, penile paresthesia, ED, urinary incontinence, fistula, rectal pain, urethral sloughing
- AUA: counsel that ED is an expected outcome of whole-gland cryosurgery; in a young man with aggressive histology it likely undertreats the disease
- Local recurrence after cryotherapy tends to occur at the apex
- Temperature: below −40°C destroys prostate cells completely in a single freeze cycle; complete cell death is unlikely above −20°C
- After the lowest temperature, the number of freeze/thaw cycles is the most clinically important parameter → a repeated cycle causes more extensive tissue damage than a single cycle
HIFU
- Delivered transrectally → previous abdominoperineal resection is an absolute contraindication
- Age, PSA level and Gleason score are not contraindications
- Median lobe = relative contraindication → some centers perform TURP before HIFU to lower the likelihood of urinary retention
Imaging Indications
Initial imaging to assess for metastasis in men without cancer-related symptoms
| Risk group | Bone scan | Abdominal-pelvic cross-sectional (CT or MRI) |
|---|---|---|
| Very low | No | No |
| Low | No | No |
| Favorable intermediate | Optional * | Recommended if a nomogram indicates > 10% risk of regional node metastasis |
| Unfavorable intermediate | Yes | Yes |
| High | Yes | Yes |
* Bone scan is optional per AUA, not recommended per NCCN or EAU.
Cross-sectional imaging is optional per AUA, not recommended per EAU; NCCN recommends CT or MRI if a nomogram indicates > 10% risk of regional node metastasis.
mpMRI may detect nodal metastasis better than CT. NCCN prefers mpMRI over CT for pelvic nodes; AUA and EAU express no preference.
- Obtain a bone scan regardless if there is bone pain or a high ALP
- EAU:
- No staging imaging for low- or favorable intermediate-risk localized disease
- PSMA PET/CT if available, or at least abdominopelvic cross-sectional imaging + bone scan, for unfavorable intermediate (weak) and high risk (strong)
- AUA (exam answer):
- No staging in asymptomatic low- or intermediate-risk disease — consider it if unfavorable intermediate
- High risk → bone scan + CT or mpMRI, and PSMA PET may be added if these are negative
- NCCN (exam answer):
- Tc-99m bone scan + CT or MRI in high risk
- In intermediate risk only when a nomogram predicts > 10% probability of pelvic lymph node involvement
Bone Scan
- Unfavorable or high risk
- AUA high risk = PSA ≥ 20 ng/mL, Grade Group 4–5 or cT3 — any single feature is enough, so PSA 25 with Gleason 6 still warrants a staging bone scan
- Bone pain
- Elevated ALP
- Vertebral uptake with a negative plain x-ray in a man likely to have metastases → spine MRI before any definitive local therapy
- FDG-PET is not useful in prostate cancer
PSMA-PET
- Biochemical recurrence after local therapy
- High-risk disease (initial staging)
- e.g. Gleason 8 (GG4) → PSMA PET/CT can substitute for CT + bone scan — more sensitive for lymph node and bone metastases
- ~27% higher accuracy than conventional imaging (proPSMA)
Management Overview
Localized → risk-stratified (see above)
Locally advanced (T3 or N1)
- Neoadjuvant ADT + EBRT + Adjuvant ADT (preferred)
- Applies to high risk too — RTOG and EORTC trials show better outcomes with longer ADT alongside EBRT
- Fit men, cN0 M0 → IMRT/VMAT + IGRT + long-term ADT ≥ 2 years (Strong)
- cN0 M0 with ≥ 2 high-risk factors (cT3–4, Gleason ≥ 8, PSA ≥ 40 ng/mL) → add 2 years of abiraterone
- RP + PLND ± XRT ± ADT
- Multimodal RP is only Weak — RCTs in locally advanced disease exist only for EBRT
Metastatic → systemic therapy (see below)
- M1 disease is not curable — the patient will never be labeled disease-free
Watchful waiting
- The intent is to give palliative therapy if the cancer progresses to the point where cancer-related symptoms are imminent or present
- Preserves quality of life by avoiding upfront local treatment and ADT
- vs active surveillance, which monitors men who are candidates for cure so the window of curability isn't missed
- Typically used in men with non-metastatic (M0) prostate cancer whose life expectancy is under 5–10 years
- Advised when life expectancy is ≤ 5 years; definitive therapy needs 8–10 years of life expectancy to reduce prostate cancer death
- e.g. incidental Gleason 3+3 in ≤ 5% of TURP tissue (cT1a) in a comorbid 80-year-old → watchful waiting
- Asymptomatic localized disease, even Gleason 8, with life expectancy < 5 years (e.g. dialysis-dependent ESRD, EF 25% heart failure) → observation
- In this limited-life-expectancy setting, ADT alone is for men with local symptoms
When to start ADT on watchful waiting
- PSA > 50
- PSADT < 12 months
- PSADT is the single most predictive factor for prostate cancer mortality
- High PVR or ureteric obstruction
- Bilateral ureteral obstruction from untreated disease (incl. progression on watchful waiting) → ADT + nephrostomy — drainage relieves the kidneys now
- ADT shrinks the hormone-naive tumor, so the tubes can often be removed
- Percutaneous nephrostomy beats retrograde stents for extrinsic compression — stents work poorly and must cross the tumor-invaded trigone; nephrostomy lets each kidney's output be measured
- Bilateral ureteral obstruction from untreated disease (incl. progression on watchful waiting) → ADT + nephrostomy — drainage relieves the kidneys now
Clinical N0M0 → pathologic N1 (prostatectomy already done)
- ADT — lifelong (the best established evidence to date)
- ADT ± XRT
- Observation
Clinical N1
- Life expectancy < 5 years → watchful waiting
- Life expectancy > 5 years → 1st: RP + long-term ADT + XRT · 2nd: XRT + long-term ADT
- Gleason 9 with bladder invasion (cT4) + enlarged pelvic node (cN1), CT and bone scan negative (exam answer) → XRT + long-term ADT; docetaxel + ADT is for metastatic disease
Active Surveillance Protocol
- PSA every 6 months; DRE annually
- Confirmatory biopsy at 1 year
- Diagnosed on systematic biopsy without MRI → MRI first, then confirmatory biopsy within 1–2 years of diagnosis — grade misattribution (25–30%) far exceeds true progression (1–2.3% per year)
- Then biopsy or MRI every 2–5 years after the confirmatory biopsy
- mpMRI to augment (does NOT replace biopsy)
- Surveillance biopsy must include the anterior apical peripheral zone and the anterior transition zone
AS is mainly for low and very low risk.
- If the patient has > 20 years life expectancy, is of African ancestry, or has high volume (> 2 cores), the risk of progression is higher — therapeutic options are better
- PSA density is one of the strongest predictors of upgrading in men with very low grade disease considering AS
- Low-risk disease (Gleason 3+3, PSA ~5) on AS → 5-year cancer-specific survival effectively 100% — low-risk disease almost never kills in the short to medium term
- ProtecT (median 15-year follow-up):
- No difference in cancer-specific or overall survival between active monitoring, surgery and radiotherapy (CSS ~99% at 10 years, ~97% at 15) — but monitoring increased metastasis
Triggers for Intervention
- Grade reclassification (GG≥2)
- Volume reclassification
- Rapidly rising PSA — a rise > 0.7/yr is the point to worry
- Exam answer: a rising or fluctuating PSA alone should not prompt immediate definitive treatment → search for higher-grade disease with MRI or surveillance biopsy
- Patient preference
Contraindications to Active Surveillance
- Intraductal carcinoma
- Aggressive → definitive treatment; to preserve sexual function, nerve-sparing RP is optimal and radiotherapy acceptable — adding ADT increases early/intermediate sexual dysfunction
- Cribriform histology
- Small cell / neuroendocrine variant — treatment is upfront chemotherapy, as it is resistant to ADT
- Germline BRCA2 (more than BRCA1 or ATM) — 80% of carriers on AS are upgraded by 10 years → consider definitive therapy even for low-grade disease
Radical Prostatectomy
- Ideal candidates for nerve-sparing — T2 or less, low risk, good baseline erection
- Bladder neck preservation does not improve the degree of incontinence, but may allow continence to return sooner
- Surgery is deferred 6–8 weeks after prostate biopsy and 12 weeks after TURP
Operative pearls
- Opening the endopelvic fascia: the small vessels crossing from the prostate to the pelvic sidewall are tributaries of the pudendal artery and veins, perforating the pelvic musculature
- Puboprostatic ligaments — divide only superficially, enough to expose the apex–dorsal vein complex junction
- Keep the pubourethral component intact to preserve anterior fixation of the striated sphincter to the pubis
- Dividing the dorsal vein complex anteriorly → the striated urethral sphincter is the major structure at risk → incontinence
- Troublesome DVC bleeding → divide the complex completely over the urethra and oversew the end — partial division + traction on the prostate opens the cut veins and worsens bleeding
- Vesicourethral anastomosis — tension-free when tied (anterior suture first); if there is tension, release the bladder from its peritoneal attachments
Complications
| Complication | Figure |
|---|---|
| ED | Almost 100% if no nerve-sparing technique |
| Loss of penile length | Mean 1 cm (range 0–5 cm) |
| Bladder neck contracture | 1–2% |
| Stress incontinence | Almost 100% at the beginning; permanent in 5% |
| VTE | — |
- After RP, incontinence is usually secondary to intrinsic sphincter deficiency
- Risk factors for SUI — surgeon experience, baseline continence, OAB, diabetes, cancer extension, prior radiotherapy, previous TURP
- Age is the strongest preoperative predictor of continence — older men have a thinner, more collagen-rich striated sphincter
- Also: larger prostate size, shorter membranous urethral length, no bilateral NVB preservation
- Nerve-sparing speeds the return of continence but does not improve final continence
- A patient needing acute transfusion for hypotension after RP should be explored to evacuate the pelvic hematoma — this reduces the likelihood of bladder neck contracture and incontinence
Prognostic Factors from RP Pathology
- Positive margins — 50% of patients with positive margins do not recur
- Capsular penetration
- SV involvement
- Gleason 8 or higher
- Lymph nodes (pathologic or gross)
- These factors are what drive the choice of salvage vs adjuvant radiotherapy
Risk factors for positive margins
- Gleason 8 or higher
- T2b–T4
- Higher number of positive cores
- PSA > 10
Positive margin site
- The most common site for a positive margin is the apex, followed by posterior, then posterolateral
- Arises while dividing the striated sphincter–dorsal vein complex — the anterior apical surface of the prostate is hard to identify
Recovery of Erectile Function
Three factors matter:
- Age — younger than 65
- Status of potency preoperatively
- Ability to preserve both neurovascular bundles intraoperatively
On-demand dosing of PDE5 inhibitors appears to be the most effective method to aid recovery of sexual function
The Neurovascular Bundle
- The NVB carries the cavernous nerves and lies outside the prostate, between the layers of lateral pelvic fascia — the levator fascia and the prostatic fascia
- Runs posterolateral to the prostate, within the lateral prostatic fascia (levator = endopelvic fascia) — not in Denonvilliers fascia
- It is formed by a sympathetic component via the hypogastric nerve (T12–L1), joining the parasympathetic component (S2–S4) just below the base of the prostate
- Capsular branches of the inferior vesical artery and veins run with the pelvic plexus branches — the NVB is the macroscopic landmark for the microscopic cavernosal nerves
- There is a 3–5 mm separation between the NVB and the prostatic capsule — which is why most men with localized disease can be offered nerve-sparing surgery
Dissection planes
| Plane | Where | Consequence |
|---|---|---|
| Interfascial | Prostatic fascia remains on the prostate | The correct nerve-sparing plane |
| Intrafascial | Beneath the prostatic fascia, directly on prostatic parenchyma | Less bleeding from capsular vessels, but high risk of positive margins |
Deciding when to excise the NVB
- No definite decision is made preoperatively — the call is made at surgery
- When the endopelvic fascia is opened:
- If induration is palpable in the lateral pelvic fascia, the NVB on that side is widely excised.
- If there is no induration but the NVB appears fixed to the prostate as it is released, it is also excised
High anterior release of the NVB at the apex
- Associated with significantly earlier recovery and return to baseline sexual function, and speeds recovery of continence
- Do NOT do a high anterior release if 2 or more of these are present:
- PSA > 10
- Gleason 6 or higher
- Biopsy core involvement on that side > 20%
- Cores with tumor on that side > 33%
- Abnormal DRE
- Because recovery at 12 months after unilateral high release equaled bilateral, it is now routinely done on one side only — the side with the more favorable pathology
Urine Leak After RP
- Contrast extravasation is usually posterior, along the weakest point of the anastomosis
- Diagnosis: fluid creatinine, cystogram or CT cystogram; CT urogram if ureteric injury is a concern
Management, in order
- Ensure the urethral catheter is patent — adequate bladder drainage is the most important step. Side-fenestrated catheters drain better and should replace other types
- Check on CT whether the drain is lying on the anastomosis — if so, adjust it; drain any collections
- Keep the drain off suction
- If those fail, put the Foley on suction — low intermittent wall suction, or an underwater pleural suction system. Avoid continuous suction, which may suck in bladder mucosa instead
- Divert the urine — bilateral nephrostomy, or bilateral open-ended ureteric catheters with the distal ends exteriorized alongside the urethral catheter, rendering the anastomosis dry
- If all fail — reconstruction
Rectal Injury
- Minor lacerations in a preoperatively prepped rectum can be repaired primarily with multilayered, non-overlapped sutures
- Moderate to extensive injuries — especially after salvage prostatectomy following radiation — are best managed with primary repair + diverting colostomy
- e.g. a 3 cm tear after pelvic radiation → layered primary repair + diverting colostomy
- Gross fecal spillage during robotic salvage RP → convert to open, colostomy, and delayed repair
- Risk of a later recto-anastomotic fistula ↑ with the extent of the laceration, prior radiation and intraoperative signs of rectal infiltration
- Postoperatively: low-residue diet and broad-spectrum antibiotics for 3–7 days
Rectourethral fistula
- Follows 1–2% of radical retropubic prostatectomies, usually at the vesicourethral anastomosis; risk ↑ after prior pelvic XRT, rectal surgery or TURP
- Large (3 cm) fistula in an irradiated pelvis → catheter drainage + fecal diversion + staged repair — catheter drainage alone rarely succeeds
PLND
- All high-risk patients
- For intermediate risk, the nomogram threshold differs by body:
| Body | Threshold |
|---|---|
| NCCN | Nomogram ≥ 2% |
| EAU | Nomogram ≥ 5% |
| AUA | Unfavorable intermediate risk |
- Complications — VTE, obturator nerve injury, lymphocele
- The internal iliac lymph nodes are the primary landing zone for nodal metastasis
- Internal iliac (hypogastric) nodes carry the highest independent risk in high-risk disease; external iliac, obturator, common iliac and presacral nodes are involved less often
- Pure Gleason 3+3 (GG1) at RP does not metastasize to pelvic nodes — nodal metastasis 0% GG1 · 0.6% GG2 · 4.3% GG3
Radiation Therapy
- Definitive dose 76–82 Gy
- Intermediate risk → ADT for 6 months
- High risk → ADT for 2–3 years
- Delivered as IMRT/VMAT + IGRT to 76–78 Gy (or moderate hypofractionation) with long-term ADT — not the 4–6 months used for intermediate risk
- Post-RP radiotherapy must be at least 64–65 Gy
- Adjuvant RT dose (exam answer): > 60 Gy (possible threshold 61.2 or 64 Gy) — whereas primary prostate RT improves with ≥ 78 Gy
PSA bounce
- May last 6–18 months after radiotherapy (some sources report up to 5 years)
- Occurs at a mean of 9 months from therapy
- Seen in about 20% of men (12–38% reported), usually within 2 years
- Rising PSA within 30 months → monitor; bounce persisting > 30 months → biopsy
XRT field and ADT duration by risk
| Risk level | XRT field | ADT duration |
|---|---|---|
| Very low / Low | Prostate ± SV | None |
| Favorable intermediate * | Prostate ± SV ± pelvic LN | Optional (4–6 months) |
| Unfavorable intermediate | Prostate + SV + pelvic LN | Recommended (4–6 months) |
| High | Prostate + SV + pelvic LN | Recommended (2–3 years) |
| N1M0 | Prostate + SV + pelvic LN | Recommended (2–3 years) |
ADT here means castration with or without a first-generation antiandrogen, typically starting 2 months before XRT.
* If classified favorable intermediate on PSA/DRE/grade but molecular tests suggest more aggressive cancer, treat as unfavorable intermediate.
Nomograms predicting SV and regional node involvement help decide whether those areas are radiated.
Brachytherapy
- Unfavorable intermediate risk (Gleason 4+3, Grade Group 3) treated with seeds → trimodality therapy: short-term ADT (4–6 months) + brachytherapy + EBRT
- LDR brachytherapy alone is reserved for favorable intermediate risk
- Brachytherapy + EBRT combined → the implant usually goes first, so EBRT can be stopped if toxicity develops
- Trimodality therapy improves biochemical control but raises long-term urinary morbidity
- Severe obstructive LUTS → prefer EBRT over brachytherapy; keep TURP for obstruction that persists (brachytherapy causes more GU toxicity, especially with prostatic hyperplasia)
- Acute urinary retention after brachytherapy: 12–35%
- Risk factors — prostate volume > 35 g, post-treatment volume > 55 g, > 33 needle punctures, AUA Symptom Score > 12
- TURP after brachytherapy → incontinence correlates with an interval of ≥ 2 years since implantation and obstructive symptoms at TURP
- Not with ADT, prostate size, pretreatment IPSS, brachytherapy dose or PSA
Rectourethral fistula after radiation
- UTIs after EBRT + brachytherapy; VCUG shows an irregular prostatic urethra with immediate rectal filling and a normal bladder → urethrorectal fistula
- First step → urinary and fecal diversion, with deferred repair
- Obliterative endarteritis leaves irradiated tissue unable to heal an early repair; diversion controls sepsis
- Staged repair is indicated for large fistulae, radiation-related fistulae, uncontrolled local or systemic infection, immunocompromise, or inadequate bowel preparation at definitive repair
Post-Prostatectomy Management
Indications for Adjuvant / Salvage RT
- Positive surgical margin (most common site = apex)
- Extracapsular extension
- SV invasion (T3)
- Detectable PSA
Indication for ADT after RP
- Positive lymph nodes (pN1)
- Adjuvant ADT is reserved for pN1 — positive margins or PSA kinetics do not select for it; pN0 → no adjuvant ADT
- pN1 after extended node dissection [EAU] → adjuvant ADT, ADT + RT, or observation (observation only with ≤ 2 positive nodes and an undetectable PSA)
- Adjuvant ADT + RT to the prostatic fossa and pelvic nodes improves survival over ADT alone or observation — most in higher-risk pathology (grade group 4, pT3, more positive nodes)
Salvage RT
- Start at PSA ≤0.5 for best outcomes
- A negative PSMA PET with rising PSA does not exclude microscopic fossa disease (it may miss low-PSA pelvic disease)
- → still give early salvage RT to the prostate bed, before PSA reaches 0.5, rather than continuing surveillance
- A negative PSMA PET with rising PSA does not exclude microscopic fossa disease (it may miss low-PSA pelvic disease)
- Minimum dose: 64 Gy to prostatic bed
- EAU: image-guided IMRT or VMAT, offered after two consecutive PSA rises without waiting for a PSA threshold
- Add ADT if PSA >0.6 (RTOG 96-01)
- Add at least 4–6 months of ADT (extendable to 18–24 months) for high-risk recurrence — Gleason 8, positive margins, short time to recurrence, or short PSA doubling time
- ADT + abiraterone is not recommended for non-metastatic biochemical recurrence
Adjuvant vs Salvage Radiotherapy
| Adjuvant | Salvage | |
|---|---|---|
| Setting | Detectable post-op PSA, or high risk of future recurrence on RP pathology | PSA undetectable post-op, then detectable later |
| When to give | PSA < 0.5, preferably at 0.1–0.2 | PSA < 0.5 |
| Timing | Usually 4–6 months post-op, once erectile function and continence have returned | On detection |
| Dose | — | At least 64–65 Gy |
- Ideal salvage candidates — PSA < 1, long PSADT, recurrence > 1–2 years after RP, life expectancy > 10 years
- The data show no difference between them, so salvage is the better default.
- The RADICALS and RAVES trials found no difference in overall survival, but the adjuvant group had more urinary tract and GI toxicity
- Adjuvant RT vs observation
- EORTC 22911 — better biochemical and clinical progression-free survival (5-year biochemical PFS 74% vs 53%), the biochemical benefit seen mainly in positive-margin patients
- No overall survival benefit
- SWOG 8794 — improved median metastasis-free survival (14.7 vs 12.9 years) and overall survival (15.2 vs 13.3 years; NNT 9.1)
- EORTC 22911 — better biochemical and clinical progression-free survival (5-year biochemical PFS 74% vs 53%), the biochemical benefit seen mainly in positive-margin patients
Selection for salvage radical prostatectomy — the patient must have:
- Biopsy-proven radio-recurrent prostate cancer
- At least 10 years of life expectancy
- No identifiable metastasis on imaging
- PSA < 10 ng/mL
Recurrence
PSA Persistence (> 0.1 ng/mL)
- 5–20% of men have PSA persistence at 4–8 weeks post-operatively
- RP is successful only if PSA becomes undetectable — persistence (PSA ≥ 0.1 ng/mL) independently predicts metastasis and cancer-specific death
- 15-year metastasis-free survival 53% with persistent PSA vs 93% with undetectable PSA (metastasis HR 3.59)
- Persistent PSA after RP is associated with more advanced disease —
- Positive surgical margins
- Pathologic stage > T3a
- Positive nodal status
- ISUP grade ≥ 3
- Repeat PSA after 8 weeks. If still persistent → PSMA. If local → XRT + ADT
- Measure the first PSA at about 8 weeks (2 months) — PSA half-life 2–3 days needs time to clear before an undetectable level can be confirmed
- PSA checked within 3 weeks is > 0.1 ng/mL in 77%, yet only 21% stay detectable → early values mislead, especially if preoperative PSA ≥ 20 ng/mL
Distinguish this from biochemical recurrence, where the PSA became undetectable first and rose later.
After RP
- PSA ≥0.2 with confirmatory rise
- Confirmatory value > 0.2 ng/mL — a sensitive cutoff that sets the timing of salvage therapy, not its site
- A single PSA of 0.15 ng/mL is not yet recurrence (needs 0.2 on two sequential tests) → repeat the PSA before MRI, PSMA PET, ADT or salvage RT
- Imaging if mets suspected: CT, bone scan, or PSMA-PET
- Risk assessment → Salvage RT ± ADT
- If local → salvage XRT + ADT — 6 months if PSA < 1, 2 years if PSA > 1
- If mets → treat as M1 disease
After RT
- PSA ≥nadir + 2
- Phoenix definition — a rise that stays below it (e.g. nadir 0.6 → 1.8) is observed, not biopsied or treated
- Biochemical failure with a PSA doubling time not explained by testosterone recovery → local salvage unlikely; define the recurrence site with mpMRI staging first, then salvage only with caution
- Imaging if mets suspected: CT, bone scan, or PSMA-PET
- Biopsy the prostate and seminal vesicles
- Interpretable only 30 months after RT is completed
- Salvage candidate with Phoenix failure, negative PSMA PET and a suspicious MRI lesion → MRI-fusion targeted biopsy (systematic alone is insufficient) to prove viable cancer before salvage
- If localized → Salvage RP, cryotherapy, brachy ± ADT
- If negative biopsy → ADT alone
- mpMRI after RT — atrophy and fibrosis lower the T2 signal across the whole gland, so T2 is less reliable; a focal T2-hypointense lesion with restricted diffusion suggests local recurrence
Contraindications OF Radiotherapy (ST-LIAR)
| Letter | Contraindication |
|---|---|
| Size | Prostate >60 cc (brachy — ↑ urinary toxicity) |
| TURP | Prior TURP if defect prevents seed placement (absolute for brachy) |
| LUTS | Significant baseline voiding symptoms |
| IBD | Active inflammatory bowel disease |
| Ataxia telangiectasia | (absolute — severe radiation response) |
| Radiation | Prior pelvic radiotherapy |
After HIFU or Cryotherapy
- No end-points have been validated against clinical progression for these modalities
- Do PSMA and a prostate biopsy plus SV biopsy
- After focal therapy, success is judged by targeted biopsy of the treated area + systematic biopsy of the untreated zone — not by PSA, DRE or mpMRI alone
- 2013 ICUD follow-up — mpMRI with a mandatory 4–6-core targeted biopsy at 3–6 months, then mpMRI + systematic biopsy at 1–2 and 5 years to catch recurrence outside the treated zone
- If mets → treat as M1 disease
- If local → salvage radical prostatectomy or salvage cryoablation
Biochemical Recurrence
- It usually takes about 8 years from the onset of biochemical recurrence until radiological metastases appear
- Then a further 5 years from metastasis to death → recurrence to death > 13 years (untreated BCR after RP; median times)
- EAU risk groups (BCR after RP)
- Low risk — PSA-DT > 1 year and Gleason < 8 (grade group < 4)
- High risk — PSA-DT ≤ 1 year or Gleason 8–10 (grade group 4–5)
Workup
- PSMA-PET — recommended as the initial imaging in biochemical recurrence [EAU]
- After RP (PSA > 0.2 ng/mL with two consecutive rises) → PSMA PET/CT is the next step if it will change treatment — separates fossa-confined from distant recurrence before salvage RT
- PSMA hybrid imaging is the most sensitive modality at PSA < 0.5 ng/mL; the PSA threshold that best predicts further metastases after RP is > 0.4 ng/mL and rising
- Conventional CT/bone scan: low yield
- After RP, limited value below PSA 10 ng/mL; after RT, CT is not useful for local recurrence at PSA < 20 ng/mL
- mpMRI performs better than PET/CT for identifying local recurrence, especially at low levels of biochemical failure
- After RP, reliably detects local recurrence at PSA 0.4–1.4 ng/mL
- After RT, MRI (contrast-enhanced, spectroscopy, diffusion-weighted) is the most sensitive test for local recurrence —
- Diffusion-weighted MRI showed 100% sensitivity and specificity against a 22-core biopsy
- TRUS is no better than DRE
- Pelvic CT mass at the urethrovesical anastomosis, anterior to the rectum (slowly rising PSA after RP) → prostatectomy-bed recurrence, not a lymph node or seminal vesicle
Management
- Local failure → Salvage (see above)
- Distant failure → Treat as mHSPC (see below)
Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT)
Goal
- Testosterone <50 ng/dL (or <1.7 nmol/L)
General Principles
- Intermittent ADT reduces ADT-related side effects compared with continuous ADT without compromising cancer control or survival
- Prostate cancer responds to castration for an average of 2–3 years before CRPC develops — though the range runs from months to > 10 years
- In men with CRPC, some cancer cells still respond to androgen suppression — so castration must be CONTINUED while other therapies are given
- ADT side effects: hot flushes, low libido, lethargy, ED, gynecomastia
- Anemia on long-term LHRH agonists — normochromic normocytic, from androgen loss (not marrow metastases); appears within 6 months and takes up to a year to reverse after ADT stops
- ADT-induced anemia is symptomatic in only about 13%; pre-ADT anemia (Hb < 12 g/dL) is associated with shorter survival
- Megestrol acetate 20 mg twice daily significantly reduces the frequency of hot flushes
- Megestrol is a progestational steroidal antiandrogen; hot flashes affect 44–80% of men on ADT and usually start about 3 months into therapy
- Progestational agents beat antidepressants — hot-flash score cut by 94.5% with cyproterone acetate and 83.7% with medroxyprogesterone, vs 47.2% with venlafaxine
- Patients on an LHRH agonist need an annual bone density scan plus regular calcium and vitamin D
Time to castrate testosterone
| Therapy | Initial T flare | Subsequent T microsurge | Time to castrate T |
|---|---|---|---|
| Orchiectomy | No | No | 3 hours (2–12 h) |
| Ketoconazole | No | Unknown | 8 hours (8–72 h) |
| LHRH agonists | Yes | Yes (~10% of the time) | 30 days |
| GnRH antagonists | No | No | Degarelix 3 days · Relugolix 15 days |
| Oral DES | No | Unknown | 10–60 days |
Mechanisms
Androgen biosynthesis inhibition
Ketoconazole
- A competitive inhibitor of several cytochrome P450 enzymes, including 11β-hydroxylase and CYP17
- Inhibiting CYP17 reduces androgen synthesis in the adrenal glands and testicles
- Inhibiting 11β-hydroxylase reduces aldosterone and glucocorticoid synthesis — so mineralocorticoids and steroids are necessary
Abiraterone (Zytiga) — take on an empty stomach
- A selective, irreversible inhibitor of CYP17
- Inactivating CYP17 blocks androgen synthesis in both testes and adrenals
- In the adrenal glands, inhibiting CYP17 reduces androgens and glucocorticoids but increases mineralocorticoids
| Abiraterone | Ketoconazole | |
|---|---|---|
| Selectivity | Selective for CYP17 | Nonselective (CYP17 + 11β-hydroxylase) |
| Potency | Potent | Weak |
| Reversibility | Irreversible | Reversible (competitive) |
| Effect on aldosterone | Increases it (inhibits only CYP17) | Decreases it (also inhibits 11β-hydroxylase) |
Abiraterone side effects
- Hyperaldosteronism / mineralocorticoid excess — fluid retention or edema 27%, hypokalemia 28%, hypertension 9%, alkalosis
- Fatigue, musculoskeletal pain, nausea, vomiting, hot flushes, diarrhea, cough, headache
- High LFTs are the most common toxicity — requires dose reduction or stopping the drug
- If the patient develops fatigue soon after starting, increase the prednisone dose
- Fatigue, nausea and anorexia on prednisone 5 mg twice daily, despite responding bone metastases = ACTH excess → temporarily double the prednisone rather than switching to enzalutamide
Steroids are mandatory with abiraterone
- mCSPC → prednisone 5 mg once daily
- mCRPC → prednisone 5 mg twice daily
- Why low-dose prednisone — complete CYP17 blockade removes pituitary feedback → mineralocorticoid excess; if hypertension, edema or hypokalemia appear → add or increase prednisone
Monitoring on abiraterone: blood pressure, potassium, phosphate, LFTs, fluid retention, and signs of adrenocortical insufficiency — every 2 weeks for the first 3 months, then monthly
- Abiraterone is approved for mCRPC before and after chemotherapy, but not for non-metastatic CRPC
1st-gen anti-androgens
Nonsteroidal antiandrogens are FDA-approved with castration, but not approved for monotherapy.
| Drug | Dose | Side effects |
|---|---|---|
| Flutamide | 250 mg PO TID | Hepatotoxicity, gynecomastia, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting — GI effects are the dose-limiting factor |
| Bicalutamide (Casodex) | 50 mg PO OD — half-life 6 days | Similar to flutamide but less GI effect. Given to prevent flare with LHRH agonist induction |
| Nilutamide | 300 mg PO OD for 30 days, then 150 mg OD | Visual disturbances, alcohol intolerance, rarely interstitial pneumonitis, nausea/vomiting |
- Mastodynia on hormonal therapy (from flutamide, nilutamide or bicalutamide) → stop the drug if possible, or give tamoxifen, or breast XRT 15 Gy, or breast reduction surgery
- Nonsteroidal antiandrogens vs castration — they block testosterone at the AR rather than lowering it → circulating testosterone rises ~1.5-fold, without hypogonadism
- Unlike steroidal cyproterone acetate, they block central ARs and remove testosterone feedback → LH, testosterone and estrogen all rise → gynecomastia and mastodynia
- Nilutamide — delayed adaptation to darkness after bright light in about a quarter of men; highest interstitial pneumonitis rate (1–2%), a class effect of nonsteroidal antiandrogens
- Bicalutamide 150 mg — no PFS benefit in localized disease (overall survival trended worse, HR 1.15); improved PFS in locally advanced disease (HR 0.67), without overall survival gain
2nd-gen anti-androgens
- These inhibit multiple steps in the AR signaling pathway; all are metabolized by hepatic cytochrome P450
- Shared side effects: fatigue, hot flushes, nausea, diarrhea, hypertension, asthenia, falls, bone fracture, musculoskeletal pain, seizure, mental impairment, ischemic heart disease
| Drug | Distinguishing feature |
|---|---|
| Enzalutamide | Crosses the blood-brain barrier and inhibits GABA receptors → seizure risk |
| Apalutamide | Also crosses the BBB and inhibits GABA receptors; the only one in the class with an appreciable rate of hypothyroidism |
| Darolutamide | Crosses the BBB in negligible amounts → fewer CNS side effects; does not increase serum testosterone, whereas enzalutamide and apalutamide can |
FDA-approved indications
| Drug | nmCRPC | mCSPC | mCRPC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Darolutamide | Approved | No | No |
| Apalutamide | Approved | Approved | No |
| Enzalutamide | Approved | Approved | Approved |
LHRH Agonists
- Agents — leuprolide (Lupron), goserelin (Zoladex) 10.8 mg q3-monthly, triptorelin
- Causes testosterone flare → cover with 1st-gen anti-androgen(Bicalutamide)
- Flare is prevented by starting the antiandrogen either at the time the LHRH agonist starts, or up to 7 days before, and continuing it for 4 weeks
- Nafarelin (LHRH agonist) → largest prostate shrinkage (~30–40%) — castration removes both testosterone and DHT; cyproterone, finasteride and flutamide shrink it progressively less
GnRH Antagonists
- Degarelix (Firmagon): 280 mg induction → 80 mg q28 days
- No flare | castration in ~3 days
- Relugolix (Orgovyx) — an oral GnRH antagonist; castration in ~15 days
- Do not use relugolix with abiraterone, enzalutamide, darolutamide or apalutamide — potential drug interactions
- It has not been adequately studied in combination with chemotherapy or any of those agents
- Do not use relugolix with abiraterone, enzalutamide, darolutamide or apalutamide — potential drug interactions
Hormonal Interventions — Overview
| Class | Drugs | Site of action | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|---|
| GnRH agonists | Leuprolide, goserelin, triptorelin | Pituitary | Stimulate LH release; the feedback loop ultimately decreases LH production. Mainstay for metastatic disease; leads to an increase in FSH |
| GnRH antagonists | Degarelix, abarelix, cetrorelix | Pituitary | Bind receptors and block GnRH release. Prevent the testosterone surge; lead to a decrease in FSH |
| Adrenal-targeting | Ketoconazole, abiraterone, orteronel, galeterone | Adrenal | Decrease androgen production from steroid precursors by blocking cytochrome P450. Given with low-dose prednisone; side effects include hypertension, edema, hypokalemia |
| 1st-gen AR antagonists | Flutamide, nilutamide, bicalutamide | Prostate | Inhibit binding of testosterone and DHT to the AR. Monotherapy not indicated; associated with gynecomastia |
| 2nd-gen AR antagonists | Enzalutamide, apalutamide | Prostate | Block the AR, minimize nuclear translocation, diminish AR-mediated transcription. Associated with falls, fatigue, decreased appetite |
| 5α-reductase inhibitors | Finasteride, dutasteride | Prostate | Inhibit testosterone → DHT. Not indicated for prostate cancer management |
Metastatic Prostate Cancer
- 55% of patients with no metastases on bone scan or CT actually have metastases on PSMA-PET
Prognostic factors
- Number of bone metastases
- Location of bone metastases
- Visceral metastases
- ISUP grade
- Initial PSA
- Performance status
- PSA level after 7 months of ADT
mCSPC
Do these in every metastatic patient
- Genetic counseling and germline testing
- Assess disease burden and symptoms
- Start calcium and vitamin D
- Start denosumab or zoledronic acid if bone metastases are present
- Add steroids if giving abiraterone or docetaxel
High volume (visceral mets OR ≥4 bone mets with ≥1 outside vertebrae/pelvis)
- ADT + docetaxel OR 2nd-gen AR agent (Apalutamide,Enzalutamide,Darolutamide)
- CHAARTED: ADT + docetaxel benefit only in high-volume disease (OS +14 mo)
Low volume — absence of visceral metastasis, any number of nodal metastases, and any of: no bone metastasis · 1–4 bone metastases in any distribution · > 4 bone metastases all confined to the vertebral bodies and pelvis
- ADT + 2nd-gen AR agent (Apalutamide,Enzalutamide,Darolutamide)
- ± prostate radiation (STAMPEDE) — men on lifelong ADT (± upfront docetaxel) randomized to prostate radiation or none
- Low volume: improved failure-free survival AND overall survival (+8% OS at 3 years)
- High volume: improved failure-free survival, but NOT overall survival
mCRPC
Definition of CRPC: castrate serum testosterone < 50 ng/dL (< 1.73 nmol/L) plus either:
- Biochemical progression — three consecutive rises in PSA, at least one week apart, resulting in two 50% increases over the nadir, with a PSA > 2 ng/mL OR
- Radiological progression — new lesions: either two or more new bone lesions on bone scan, or a soft tissue lesion
Symptomatic progression alone is NOT sufficient to diagnose CRPC
No prior docetaxel
| Prior 2nd-gen AR | Options |
|---|---|
| No | ADT + Docetaxel or Enzalutamide or Apalutamide, Radium-223 (symptomatic bone mets, no visceral, LN ≤3 cm) |
| Yes | ADT + Docetaxel, Sipuleucel-T, Pembrolizumab (MMR/MSI-H), Olaparib/Rucaparib (BRCA2/HRR) |
Prior docetaxel
| Prior 2nd-gen AR | Options |
|---|---|
| No | ADT + Cabazitaxel, Enzalutamide, Apalutamide, Radium-223, Sipuleucel-T |
| Yes | Cabazitaxel, Radium-223, Sipuleucel-T, Pembrolizumab (MMR/MSI-H), Olaparib/Rucaparib (BRCA2/HRR) |
Radium-223 — the full criteria
- Indicated for men with ALL of: symptomatic bone metastases, no visceral metastases, and malignant lymphadenopathy ≤ 3 cm
- Treats bone metastases in CRPC — not a treatment for locally advanced or nodal disease itself (e.g. cT4 cN1 → XRT + long-term ADT)
- Do NOT combine radium-223 with chemotherapy — cumulative myelosuppression
- Do NOT combine radium-223 with abiraterone — increased fractures and mortality
Sipuleucel-T — not recommended in men with any of:
- Using opioids to control cancer-related pain
- Visceral metastasis
- Rapidly progressive disease
- Life expectancy < 6 months
- Large tumor burden
- ECOG performance status ≥ 2
- Small cell or neuroendocrine prostate cancer
Antihistamines must be given with sipuleucel-T
PARP inhibitors (Olaparib/Rucaparib)
- Target tumors with DNA repair defects
- Durable responses in mCRPC with germline BRCA2 mutations, or somatic DNA-repair gene mutations — BRCA1/2, ATM, Fanconi anemia genes, CHEK2 (detected by next-generation sequencing)
Chemotherapy
Docetaxel — a mitotic inhibitor that prevents cell division. Give with prednisone 5 mg BID. For high-volume metastatic disease.
- Side effects — bone marrow suppression, fatigue, neutropenia, anemia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, sensory neuropathy, alopecia, nail dystrophy, dysgeusia, stomatitis, dyspnea, peripheral edema
Cabazitaxel — same mechanism. Approved for mCRPC previously treated with a docetaxel-containing regimen.
- Side effects similar to docetaxel, but additionally low platelets, neutropenia (including febrile neutropenia) and diarrhea — but generally NOT neuropathy
- Cabazitaxel is not susceptible to MDR1, which is why it retains efficacy in docetaxel-resistant cancers
Platinum agents
- Indicated in small cell prostate cancer, and perhaps in other mCRPC subsets — combined TP53 and PTEN inactivation, or DNA repair deficiency mutations
- Neuroendocrine tumors are invariably unresponsive to hormonal manipulation, but are transiently sensitive to radiotherapy and chemotherapy — platinum-etoposide or platinum-taxane combinations
AR-V7 — a blood-based biomarker used to help choose therapy in mCRPC
- AR-V7 positive → may benefit more from taxane chemotherapy
- AR-V7 negative → may benefit similarly from either AR-directed therapy or chemotherapy
nmCSPC
Not curable, and local therapy has failed.
- Asymptomatic → surveillance or ADT
- Symptomatic → ADT
nmCRPC
- nmCRPC = rising PSA + castrate testosterone + negative CT and bone scan
- PSADT >10 months → observe
- PSADT <10 months + LE >5 yr → ADT + AR-targeted therapy (Apalutamide / Enzalutamide / Darolutamide)
- Pivotal trials (SPARTAN, PROSPER, ARAMIS) enrolled PSADT ≤ 10 months → agent added to ongoing ADT → metastasis-free survival AND overall survival benefit
Bone Health in CRPC with Mets
- Denosumab 120 mg SC q4wk OR Zoledronate 4 mg IV q4wk + Ca + vitamin D
- Calcium and vitamin D given daily with both agents
- Denosumab vs zoledronate: superior time-to-first SRE; no OS difference
- Zoledronate contraindicated if CrCl <30; denosumab no renal adjustment
- Serum creatinine elevation is the zoledronate toxicity that governs dosing → check renal function before each dose; dose-adjust for lesser renal impairment
- Denosumab → no renal monitoring needed either
- Denosumab is not eliminated by the kidney; zoledronic acid is — denosumab SC, zoledronic acid IV
- Both cause osteonecrosis of the jaw
- ONJ = exposed maxillofacial bone that fails to heal within 8 weeks in a patient on or previously on bisphosphonates, without prior craniofacial radiotherapy
- Zoledronic acid → ONJ in 21% after the third year → dental examination before starting therapy
- Other bisphosphonate side effects: pyrexia · hypocalcemia (plus renal impairment and ONJ, above)
How zoledronic acid works
- A nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate — concentrates in bone at sites of active resorption
- Inside the osteoclast it inhibits farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase → blocks prenylation of small GTPases (Ras, Rho, Rac) → osteoclast apoptosis
How denosumab works
- When cancer metastasizes to bone it increases RANK ligand, which activates more RANK receptor, driving osteoclast activity
- Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds RANK ligand, preventing it from binding the RANK receptor — breaking the link that causes bone resorption
NOT approved for SRE prevention in mHSPC
Spinal Cord Compression
- Emergency — MRI is diagnostic
- → Dexamethasone (10 mg load, 4 mg q6h) + RT ± surgical decompression
- Start high-dose corticosteroids on mere suspicion — don't wait for imaging
- Dose range (exam answer): dexamethasone 4–10 mg load, then 4–24 mg q6h (the regimen above sits within this range)
- RT and/or surgical decompression follow imaging
- Surgery first if: unknown tissue dx, prior RT to area, pathological fracture with instability
Palliative RT for Bone Pain
- Single fraction 800 cGy = preferred for uncomplicated non-spinal bone mets